I can't be arsed to find a picture but a nice TR5. Always fancied a tr6 in my youth but never had one only 2 stags but now I think I prefer the 5 over the 6.
Ahhhh not allowed Stacey too young ... pick againView attachment 62367 Mine is sooooo obvious!!!
I'm with you on that, love the TRs (not the 7)I can't be arsed to find a picture but a nice TR5. Always fancied a tr6 in my youth but never had one only 2 stags but now I think I prefer the 5 over the 6.
Not the 7 !!!I'm with you on that, love the TRs (not the 7)
I have never seen that tr9 concept before looks interesting but still not as pretty as the 5I'm with you on that, love the TRs (not the 7)
How about a TR9?
View attachment 62369 View attachment 62370
Well maybe, but I'm not saying it was a bad car it was just not like any of its predecessors, certainly a car of its time, but much more BL than Triumph inspired. ............................. OK off the fence, I think it was a BAD carNot the 7 !!!
Are you mad !!!!!
Ok the first production was a bit ropy due to the British Leyland strikes, but it stands out from the crowd these days they have, everything from a 2.0L to 5.0L engines.
Also sold more tr7 than any other Triumph.
How about a BMW 2002Ahhhh not allowed Stacey too young ... pick again
They are nice if you have the odd 200k + lying aroundYes, must say I like the Z8. There was a low mileage one for sale at Sytners, Nottingham earlier this year. Looked gorgeous!
But the Thread is about a classic/25 year plus car. It's pretty obvious a modern car will out perform older cars.
You don't buy a classic car to drive every day, I get a great deal of pleasure just seeing some of the cars in this thread. Stunning and nostalgic evoking great memories.
A proper breadvan that can do pizza too:What did Ferrari copy to get that shape Martin ?
Tony.