Undue care and attention. Fails to mention in the headline though that said estate was bumped up on the pavement whilst straddling double yellow lines. Should be and interesting debate between insurance companies.
A no-brainer for many reasons - 100% Audi's fault.Undue care and attention. Fails to mention in the headline though that said estate was bumped up on the pavement whilst straddling double yellow lines. Should be and interesting debate between insurance companies.
No doubt that the Audi is at fault, he hit a stationary car, period. It won't stop his insurance arguing that his client hit an illegally parked car though.A no-brainer for many reasons - 100% Audi's fault.
...that was the other side of a solid white line. It is no different than if it were parked in the middle of a farmer's field without permission.No doubt that the Audi is at fault, he hit a stationary car, period. It won't stop his insurance arguing that his client hit an illegally parked car though.
Some knock though - could have been much worse - thankfully the children were more or less alright!Probably end up as knock for knock as both cars are in positions they were not legally entitled to be in then both insurance company's will refuse claims for illegal maneuvers and keep the premiums
Insurance company wins again
Evening my Polak friend, could you please stick to using English on this forum?What if the estate car he broken down?
Haha would you prefer Station Wagon munchkin? Ooh and good evening to you also.Evening my Polak friend, could you please stick to using English on this forum?
Thank you ....
he broken down?
Reading the report says parked with passenger door open ,but if he had broken down could be his saving graceWhat if the estate car had broken down?